Cablegate - the top tech story of 2010?


It would appear that 2010 might very well be the year that the Internet came of age - the year that it stepped out of its middling adolescence and became a fully grown-up member of the information community. The furore that has been generated in recent days over what has become known as "Cablegate", or more practically the "United States diplomatic cables leak", represents the biggest technology - and Internet-specific - news story of 2010, and marks a large shift in how people view the Internet's ability to release and disseminate information in a very quick and efficient manner.
The fact is, the recent leaking of USA diplomatic cables might not be a very interesting story in and of itself, since the contents of almost all of the cables are nothing more than gossip and personal opinion, but what it does represent is a serious breach of US national security, and proves more than anything else ever has that in this new digital era we live in, it is extremely easy for documents and files to be copied and transmitted out there. And unlike previous forms of communication, once the material is out there, it's nigh on impossible to get the genie back into the box. The house is very much outta the barn.
The reason the content of these cables is interesting is because of the implications inherent in the US having their once private conversations about various countries and world leaders aired in public. Some of what the US pollys have said in these are really rather embarrasing, and in so many ways have dealt a serious blow to US diplomatic relations around the globe. The simple fact is, the alllies of the USA cannot rely on the US going forward regarding matters such as security, confidentiality, and above all just plain simple trust itself. This really has been a game-changer. To quote Wikipedia on the contents:
The contents of the U.S. diplomatic cables leak describe in detail events and incidents surrounding international affairs from 274 embassies dating from 28 December 1966 to 28 February 2010. The diplomatic cables revealed numerous unguarded comments and revelations: critiques and praises about the host countries of various U.S. embassies, discussion and resolutions towards ending ongoing tension in the Middle East, efforts for and resistance against nuclear disarmament, actions in the War on Terror, assessments of other threats around the world, dealings between various countries, U.S. intelligence and counterintelligence efforts, U.S. support of dictatorship and other diplomatic actions.
The leaked cables expose that British official revealed that diplomats of the U.S. and Britain eavesdropped on Secretary General Kofi Annan in the weeks before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, even though international treaties prohibit spying at the UN. Further, they reveal that U.S. diplomats told an Afghan government official to keep quiet after they learned that a major U.S. government contractor firm was pimping little boys to be auctioned off to be homosexually raped by Afghan policemen in parties organized by the contractor.
This was all material that was never meant to see the light of day, but now has - all because of how easy it was for a single US soldier stationed overseas to download the cables onto portable media and get it shipped off to Wikileaks. The fact that an online distribution system was chosen, rather than a more traditional print-based media, makes the leaks all the more interesting. Despite attempts at various levels to shut down Wikileaks by the US Government, and prevent the cables from being released, now that they're out there, an infinite number of copies exist. There's no going back from here.
The really sad part to this whole story has been the deep focus on Wikileaks for releasing the cables, as opposed to the flaws in US Defence security which allowed for the cables to be leaked in the first place. The fact the media have been more than happy to go along with the US Government's line about Wikileaks being the problem here makes things just a tiny bit scary. We clearly now live in a world where the mainstream media can effectively wage a war against a single organisation, with scant regard for the integrity of the process involved here. I guess it's just sour grapes that they didn't do the leaking.
I guess this story is going to be evolving quite rapidly between now and the end of the year - already there's been reports about Amazon having to relinquish their hosting of Wikileaks, possibly due to Government interference, but also apparently Paypal have cut off their donation facility to Wikileaks. Really, though, I think the mainstream media's reaction is the worst aspect of this story, and I can sum it up like this - if my Hotmail account were hacked, and the contents of my emails distributed over the Internet, would the MSM media be calling for the culprit's arrest? I really do somehow doubt it...
